"ENGLISH DAY" Contest

Approved by ............................ Ch.Zolzaya (Head, Department of English Studies)

 “Video Project” competition will be held on April 19 on the occasion of “English Day Celebration”

between the students who are studying “English for Specific Purpose”/ S. ESP310/. Students will work together in a team to create the VIDEO-PROJECT that details the given topics. The presentation should include appropriate photographs, video, music, graphs, and other visual aids. The final project should

be turned into a DVD in a Full Quality QuickTime movie format.

TOPICS for VIDEO-PROJECT:

-The Effects of Technology on Learning English

(The Impact of Using Technology in Learning English)

-Technology in Everyday Life

Video Project Rubric

           

ACTIVITY	Exemplary	Proficient	Partially Proficient	Incomplete	POINTS
Concept	15-20 points Has a clear picture of what they are trying to achieve. Adequate description of what they are trying to do and generally how his/her work will contribute to the final project.	10-14 points Has a fairly clear picture of what they are trying to achieve. Can describe what they are trying to do overall but has trouble describing how his/her work will contribute to the final project.	5-9 points Has brainstormed their concept, but no clear focus has emerged. Goals/final product not clearly defined.	0-4 points Little effort has been spent on brainstorming and refining a concept. Unclear on the goals and how the project objectives will be met.
Script/ Storyboard	12-15 points The storyboard illustrates the video presentation structure with thumbnail sketches of each scene. Notes of proposed transition, special effects, sound and title tracks incl: text, color, placement, graphics, etc. Notes about proposed dialogue/narration text are included.	8-11 points The storyboard includes thumbnail sketches of each video scene and includes text for each segment of the presentation, descriptions of background audio for each scene, and notes about proposed shots and dialogue.	4-7 points The thumbnail sketches on the storyboard are not in logical sequence and do not provide complete descriptions of the video scenes, audio background, or notes about the dialogue.	0-3 points There is no evidence of a storyboard or script.
Content/ Organization	15-20 points The content includes a clear statement of purpose or theme and is creative, compelling and clearly written. A rich variety of supporting information in the video contributes to the understanding of the project’s main idea. Events and messages are presented in a logical order. Includes properly cited sources.	10-14 points Information is presented as a connected theme with accurate, current supporting information that contributes to understanding the project’s main idea. Details are logical and persuasive information is effectively used. The content includes a clear point of view with a progression of ideas and supporting information.	5-9 points The content does not present a clearly stated theme, is vague, and some of the supporting information does not seem to fit the main idea or appears as a disconnected series of scenes with no unifying main idea.	0-4 points Content lacks a central theme, clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Much of the supporting information is irrelevant to the overall message..
Quality	12-15  points Movie was completed and had all required elements. The video was well edited and moves smoothly from scene to scene with proper use of transitions. Audio and other enhancements were well used.	8-11 points Movie was completed and contained all required items. Editing was not done as well as it should have been. Some poor shots remain. Movie is still somewhat choppy. Audio and other enhancements were utilized, but not for maximum effect.	4-7 points Movie was made, but had very little if any editing. Many poor shots remain. Video was very fragmented and choppy with little to no audio reinforcement.	0-3 points There was no movie, or tape was totally unedited with no transitions or audio support of any kind.
Teamwork	12-15 points Student met and had discussions regularly. All students on the team contributed to the discussion and were part of the final project. Team members showed respect with each other.	8-11 points Students met and had discussions regularly. Most of the students on the team contributed to the discussion and were part of the final project. Team members mostly showed respect with each other.	4-7 points Only a couple of team meetings were held. Most of the students on the team contributed at some level, but a majority of the work was done by one or two.	0-3 points Meetings were not held and/or some of the team members did not contribute at all to the project. Low levels of respect were evident within the team.
Timeliness	12-15 points All project deadlines were met.	8-11 points Most project deadlines were met. Those that were late did not have significant impact on the finished project.	4-7 points Many project deadlines were not met, resulting in some impact on the finished project.	0-3 points Deadlines were regularly missed, having a significant impact on the final project.
Final Score

Teachers who are responsible for branch schools at MUST

№	Schools	Teachers	Deadline
1	Power Engineering	Ch.Zolzaya, Ch.Solongo	April 19
2	Civil and Architectural Engineering	A.Mungunchimeg,P.Baymbajav, T.Gerelmaa	April 19
3	Geology and Mining	J.Gantsetseg, B.Banzragch, T.Tsend-Auysh	April 19
4	Industry and Technology	S.Dugarmaa, N.Oyuntsetseg	April 19
5	Mechanic and Transportation	S.Sarantuya, G.Ariunaa, B.Burmaa	April 19
6	Applied Science	N.Altanzul	April 19
7	Business Administration and Humanity	R.Narantsetseg, A.Navchaa	April 19
8	Information and Telecommunication	D.Bayarmaa, A.Bolormaa	April 19